Suman Mazumdar, Sarita Kumari
The Integrated
Teacher Education Programme (ITEP), introduced under the National Education
Policy (NEP) 2020, seeks to transform teacher education in India by integrating
disciplinary knowledge with pedagogical training in a four-year dual-major
degree. While the programme promises a holistic, stage-specific approach
aligned with the 5+3+3+4 school structure, this paper critically evaluates its
structural design, curricular coherence, and implementation feasibility.
Drawing upon policy documents, curriculum frameworks, and emerging scholarly
critiques, the paper highlights both opportunities—such as integrated learning,
improved practicum exposure, and cost-effectiveness—and significant challenges,
including disciplinary dilution, infrastructural gaps, and limited career
flexibility. The analysis foregrounds conceptual contradictions in ITEP's
vision and exposes practical challenges related to institutional readiness,
performance-based assessment, and community engagement. Furthermore, the paper
questions the implicit critique of existing teacher competencies embedded
within the ITEP design and reflects on the ethical implications of its
evaluative framework. It concludes with actionable suggestions for ensuring
meaningful interdisciplinary integration, improving pedagogical depth,
strengthening practicum, and expanding student agency within the programme. The
study argues for a phased, context-sensitive rollout of ITEP with sustained
financial and institutional support, warning that without strategic reform and
adequate investment, the policy’s transformative aspirations may remain
unfulfilled.
Integrated
Teacher Education Programme (ITEP), NEP 2020, Teacher Education Reform, Dual-Major
Structure, Pedagogy and Practice, Curriculum and Assessment, Institutional
Implementation, Multidisciplinary Integration
VOL.17, ISSUE No.4, December 2025